How to Choose the Right Clipping Company - and How to Assess Whether It Is Actually Doing Its JobHow to Choose the Right Clipping Company - and How to Assess Whether It Is Actua

Your choice of clipping provider can define the success or failure of your communications strategy. The repercussion of certain news stories can make or break a brand, and knowing the advertising equivalent value of each item of coverage is essential to understanding what your media presence is truly worth. Clipping enables you to direct and optimise press activity towards specific audiences — which is precisely why choosing the right kind of provider, and knowing how to evaluate its performance, matters so much.

Today, the volume of information is so vast that no human being can access everything. Paradoxically, the excess of information can itself become a source of misinformation.

What to Demand from Any Clipping Provider

Never engage a clipping company that does not offer transcription — that is, the conversion of audio into text — for radio, television and online video. Companies that cannot do this have simply not kept pace with the times, and their service is severely limited as a result.

Any reputable provider should offer, as standard:

• Tone analysis — positive, negative or neutral

• Advertising equivalent value

• Author name for each piece of coverage

• Regional identification of each outlet

• Mention of the highest-audience outlets

• Listing of the most widely covered stories over any given period

Equally important: never engage a clipping company that only grants access to audio, video and print material for a short window. Some providers make captured content available for as little as 30 days — which is simply not fit for purpose. Insist that all archived material remains accessible, via cloud storage or equivalent, for the full duration of the contract.

Your clipping archive should also be accessible through a dedicated web platform, allowing you to extract reports across the entire historical record at any time.

A word of caution: there is a great deal of misleading practice in the clipping market. Some large companies — including at least one publicly listed firm — present an impeccable marketing front whilst delivering a poor-quality service that omits precisely the elements that make clipping genuinely useful.

Manual Clipping or Technology-Driven Clipping?

News monitoring across media channels — radio, television, websites, print and social networks — can be carried out in two ways.

1. Manual Clipping (the Traditional Model)

In this approach, clipping operators watch, listen to and read content directly in order to supply information to clients.

Disadvantages:

• Coverage is limited to the most prominent outlets — often not even all of those. Expanding the scope would require hiring additional operators, making it financially unviable. Regional radio and television stations of small or medium size are routinely excluded. The result is, at best, a partial picture.

• The quality of the output depends entirely on human factors. When an operator is having a difficult day, the clipping suffers accordingly — and stories slip through unnoticed.

Advantages:

• At present, there are none worth noting. Clients who continue to use this model are, in practical terms, paying for an incomplete service. It is, as the saying goes, buying a cat in a bag.

• 
  

2. Technology-Driven Clipping

This is the approach most aligned with the inevitable direction of technological change — automating repetitive processes and empowering strategic decisions with faster, more precise information.

Points to assess before signing a contract:

• Pay close attention to the quality of transcription for radio and television content. Technology-driven systems identify coverage by searching transcriptions and then surfacing the audio or video clip containing the relevant keyword or phrase. Poor transcription is the equivalent of a traditional clipping operator working through illness or distraction — stories will be missed.

• Any software-based clipping company must also provide the name of the programme, the media outlet, and where mentioned, the journalist's name — in accordance with authorship rights as established under the Berne Convention.

Advantages:

• A technology-driven system can reach printed, broadcast, radio and digital content — news portals, video platforms and beyond — across virtually any geography. A story can gain traction through any outlet, however small or regional, and a robust system will capture it.

• A practical benchmark worth applying: DigitalClip's transcription engine operates at a verified accuracy rate of 99.7%. In direct comparisons with competing providers — including the publicly listed company referenced above — rivals have failed to reach even 70% transcription accuracy, meaning a substantial proportion of relevant coverage never reaches the client.

• Clients typically have access to a dedicated personal archive with simultaneous access points, enabling the generation of quantitative and qualitative reports across any time period and on any topic of their choosing.

• Effective automation reduces time and resource costs whilst increasing both the precision and the breadth of monitoring.

Putting It Into Practice

Access the DigitalClip platform and follow your coverage in real time — 24 hours a day. Protect your business and your brand. Strengthen your credibility with broad, accurate information. Simply register the keywords and phrases that matter to you, and monitor everything across a platform connected to millions of media sources. Manage press crises as they unfold, track your brand's media footprint alongside that of your competitors, and use the data to justify investment in marketing and communications — and to demonstrate the results you have achieved.